Monitor readiness & escalation

HC-MON-01 / A CONCEPT
Monitor readiness & escalation
DRAFT — educator and biomedical review required
HCM-T01 / HC-CFG-01-A-CONCEPT

Rehearse component identity, a mismatch decision and a clear next owner on the fictional HCM-T01 trainer.

01. Confirm the training boundary [BODY]
Confirm this is a designated inert or digital training exercise with an educator. Use no patient or live clinical equipment.
Evidence: Training scope confirmed.
STOP: Stop if training status is unclear.

02. Read the configuration and source [BODY]
Match HCM-T01, HC-CFG-01-A-CONCEPT and this A CONCEPT draft. Identify the procedure owner and any approved replacement source.
Evidence: Asset, configuration, source revision and reviewer named.
STOP: Hold if the exact source is missing or conflicts.

03. Identify the station [BODY]
Compare the housing, blank display, fixed handle and support with the concept reference. This is an identity exercise, not proof of real device equivalence.
Evidence: The intended trainer is identified.
STOP: Do not substitute an unfamiliar real monitor.

04. Locate the left port [P1]
Select P1 in the model. Keep its left-side location and external axis consistent with the reference.
Evidence: P1 correctly named in the concept.
STOP: A plausible visual fit is insufficient evidence.

05. Compare accessory identities [C-A]
Distinguish round C-A from rectangular C-B. Use the source identity/compatibility record when supplied; never infer compatibility from color.
Evidence: Expected and observed accessory identities recorded.
STOP: No approved source record: do not infer compatibility.

06. Review the matched branch [C-A]
The intended C-A branch teaches external alignment and axial movement on an approved inert/digital trainer. A reviewer must first approve the exact fit and motion reference.
Evidence: Approved reference identified, or motion marked pending.
STOP: Until approved, inspect the model without attempting seating.

07. Reset to the challenge [C-B]
Present the C-B scenario separately. Keep the lead clear of P1; no connector or port geometry changes between branches.
Evidence: C-B remains separate and visible.
STOP: Do not insert, force or morph C-B to fit.

08. Choose the hold [C-B]
The meaningful wrong choice is Continue with C-B. The correct concept response is HOLD and explain the identity/key discrepancy.
Evidence: Reason for HOLD stated in the learner’s own words.
STOP: A lesson must block forced successful seating.

09. Record the unresolved evidence [NOTE]
Keep expected C-A, observed C-B, source revision and the missing compatibility evidence in an equipment-only note.
Evidence: Synthetic discrepancy and HELD state recorded.
STOP: Do not invent an instrument reading or validation result.

10. Name the next owner [TAG-H]
Identify the educator or designated review role responsible for the next decision. Keep the equipment restriction attached to that ownership.
Evidence: Reviewer role and next action are explicit.
STOP: Unknown owner leaves the handover incomplete.

11. Close the communication loop [NOTE]
The receiver repeats the asset, HELD restriction and next owner. The sender confirms the repeat-back.
Evidence: Equipment-only acknowledgement captured in the rehearsal.
STOP: Do not include patient or private staff information.

12. Review the learning separately [TAG-H]
Review the attempt against educator criteria and propose any content clarification for human approval. The physical training item remains held until its authorized owner resolves the evidence.
Evidence: Lesson review and equipment status remain separate.
STOP: Passing the exercise never releases clinical equipment.

Source basis: Existing HCM-T01 scenario and continuity bible; no approved operating SOP supplied.
A completed rehearsal never releases equipment for clinical use.